🔢 OmniVaults vs AMM Pools: The Capital Efficiency Math
**Dexalot breaks down the numbers** comparing traditional AMM pools to their OmniVault solution:
**AMM pools require:**
- $200k for decent liquidity depth
- Liquidity fragmented across 5 chains ($40k each)
- Different prices on each chain
- Slippage on larger trades
- Impermanent loss and MEV exposure
- Managing multiple pools
**OmniVaults deliver:**
- $20k for equivalent depth (10x more efficient)
- Single deposit covers all chains
- Unified pricing
- Zero slippage with limit orders
- Earnings from fees, PnL, and rewards
- Automated management
The platform uses a hub-and-spoke model with 90% of liquidity on Dexalot L1's order book, with smaller allocations on Avalanche, Arbitrum, Base, and BNB Chain for atomic swaps.
[Try OmniVaults](http://app.dexalot.com/vaults)