THORChain Marketing Shift Delivers 27% Session Growth and Page-One SEO Rankings

📈 Numbers don't lie

By Thorchain
May 18, 2026, 2:24 PM
twitter

THORChain's recent marketing efforts are showing measurable results.​ The protocol reported a 27% increase in website sessions alongside improved search engine visibility, with SEO rankings now appearing on page one.​

Key developments include:

  • Full website redesign currently in progress
  • Growing presence through Messari and social channels
  • Improved organic discoverability

This marketing update follows a strong Q1 2026 that saw $2.​8B in trading volume and the integration of Solana.​ The protocol also shipped v3.​17.​0, featuring over 100 improvements to security, swaps, and cross-chain functionality.​

The team attributes the growth to strategic positioning and consistent execution across multiple channels.​ As THORChain expands to additional chains including Polygon, Cardano, and Monero, the marketing infrastructure appears to be scaling alongside protocol development.​

Read the full marketing report

Sources

THORChain isn’t slowing down. With the release of v3.17.0, the network just shipped one of its biggest upgrades yet; packed with 100+ improvements across security, swaps, cross-chain reliability, governance, and developer tooling. The full recap breaks it all down 👇

253
Reply

Finally, THORChain’s Q1 2026 quarterly report is here, highlighting major milestones from $2.8B in volume to Solana integration, along with key UX upgrades like memoless transactions, rapid swaps, and the native API. It is worth reading to see how the ecosystem is expanding

157
Reply
Read more about Thorchain

THORChain Identifies Malicious Node Behind $10.7M Vault Compromise

THORChain contributors have traced a $10.7M vault compromise to a newly churned node that entered the network days before the attack. Investigators believe a single malicious actor exploited a vulnerability in the GG20 TSS implementation, allowing vault key material to leak over time until the attacker could reconstruct the private key. **Current Network Status:** - Network paused by node operators - RUNE transfers and chain observation may resume within 12 hours - Trading, LP actions, and signing remain paused pending recovery plan - User funds appear unaffected; only protocol-owned funds lost **Recovery Options Under Discussion:** - Slashing bonds of affected vault nodes - Using Protocol-Owned Liquidity (POL) to absorb losses - Community-driven alternative proposals The Treasury is working with Outrider Analytics and law enforcement to identify the attacker and recover funds. Full network functionality restoration will likely take several days as the community aligns on a remediation approach.

THORChain Ships 51 Protocol Upgrades in v3.18 Release

THORChain has deployed version 3.18, a significant protocol upgrade containing 51 merged improvements. **Key Updates:** - **POL foundations** - New protocol-owned liquidity infrastructure - **Dynamic fee architecture** - Adaptive fee system implementation - **New asset groundwork** - Technical preparation for Monero, TAO, and Polkadot integration - **Security enhancements** - Major solvency protections and infrastructure hardening This follows the v3.17.0 release from April, which included over 100 improvements to security, swaps, and cross-chain functionality. Full technical details: [THORChain Blog](https://blog.thorchain.org/thorchain-protocol-upgrade-v3-18/)

THORChain's Architecture Eliminates Single Point of Failure in DeFi

**Independent Verification Over Shared Trust** Most DeFi protocols rely on shared RPCs (Remote Procedure Calls) to read blockchain data. If that RPC serves incorrect information, every system downstream—oracles, bots, dashboards—acts on false data. **THORChain's Approach** - Each THORNode runs its own full node for every supported chain - No shared RPC infrastructure - No third-party intermediaries for Bitcoin or Ethereum state - Consensus only occurs when independent nodes agree on chain state **Why It Matters** This design separates protocols that independently verify truth from those that trust external sources. THORNodes cooperate to enable cross-chain swaps, but that cooperation is built on independent verification rather than shared assumptions. The architecture prevents systemic failures that audits cannot catch.

THORChain Burns 64M RUNE Tokens, Reducing Total Supply to 360M

THORChain Burns 64M RUNE Tokens, Reducing Total Supply to 360M

THORChain has completed a burn of 64.4 million $RUNE tokens, reducing the total supply to 360 million—down from 1 billion at launch. The burn brings the market cap to fully diluted valuation (MC/FDV) ratio to 97%, with circulating supply now within 3% of total supply. **Key Details:** - Total supply decreased from 500M to 360M following ADR023 approval - 5% of all protocol fees continue burning tokens daily - $RUNE operates as a deflationary token by design - Analytics sites still show 500M max supply, but nodes will vote to update the MAXRUNESUPPLY setting to 360M once alignment is complete The burn came from the Reserve using system income. More data available at [Dune Analytics](https://dune.com/thorchain/thorchain-overview).

Why Bridge Hacks Keep Happening and How Atomic Swaps Solve It

**Bridges don't actually move your assets** - they lock them in vaults and issue wrapped tokens as IOUs. When you bridge ETH to Solana, your real ETH sits locked while you receive a synthetic token representing a promise to unlock it later. **This architecture creates a critical vulnerability**: the system must maintain perfect synchronization between locked assets and minted synthetics. Major exploits include: - Wormhole: $320M lost - Ronin: $600M lost - Nomad: $190M lost **THORChain uses a different approach** with atomic swaps. When swapping ETH for SOL, your Ethereum enters a threshold-signature vault while native Solana from a separate vault goes to your address. No wrapped tokens exist. **Key differences**: - Bridge hack → your wrapped tokens become worthless - Atomic swap → transaction either completes or refunds, no synthetic tokens at risk **The tradeoff**: Native swaps are slower and more expensive than bridges, but eliminate the failure mode where users discover their wrapped tokens have no backing. With atomic swaps, you never hold someone else's promise.