Radiant's gLP Token: Yield-Bearing Protection Fund Goes Live

A new infrastructure model is emerging that uses **two distinct architectures** to serve different capital profiles without forcing either into a compromised position. The approach recognizes that capital allocators have fundamentally different needs: - **Conservative allocators** seek deep liquidity, established assets, and predictable behavior - **Growth-oriented allocators** want access to newer markets and higher yield potential with contained exposure Traditional single-architecture systems force both groups into the same risk environment, creating suboptimal outcomes for everyone involved. This dual-architecture model allows each capital type to operate in its appropriate risk environment while maintaining infrastructure efficiency. The design reflects how capital actually behaves in practice rather than imposing artificial constraints.

Radiant's RIZv2 architecture creates a clear separation between conservative and risk-tolerant capital allocation. **Key Features:** - **Risk containment**: Problems in RIZv2 markets remain isolated and don't affect core depositors - **Dual infrastructure**: Core markets serve blue-chip assets with shared liquidity, while RIZv2 offers isolated exposure to newer markets - **Capital efficiency**: Each market type attracts appropriate risk profiles without cross-subsidization The separation allows conservative allocators to access established assets with predictable behavior, while risk-tolerant users can pursue higher yields in contained environments.

Radiant operates two distinct contract architectures, each designed to handle different capital behaviors within the protocol. **Key Points:** - Two separate architectures manage capital with different profiles - Each system operates independently without compromising the other - The design reflects how capital actually moves and behaves in practice This architectural split isn't added complexity—it's infrastructure built around real capital dynamics. The dual system allows Radiant to optimize for different use cases while maintaining protocol integrity across its omnichain money market.

Coverage funds have a hard cap tied to their size. When claims exceed available funds, users receive proportional distributions rather than full coverage. **Key mechanics:** - Fund size is visible on-chain as an auditable parameter - No promises—just verifiable constraints - Proportional distribution when capacity is exceeded This approach provides bounded downside risk, which remains preferable to undefined exposure. All limits are transparent and enforced at the protocol level.