Ledger Connect Issue Fixed

By Balancer
Jan 16, 2024, 9:38 AM
twitter

The Ledger Connect issue reported yesterday has been fixed.​ Balancer was not affected and the frontend is safe to use.​ Users are advised to stay vigilant and exercise caution with their transactions.​

Sources

WARNING: A potential vulnerability has been detected with Ledger Connect. We advise all users to exercise heightened caution and avoid using the Balancer frontend until further information is available. x.com/bantg/status/1…

banteg
banteg
@banteg

🚨 ledger library confirmed compromised and replaced with a drainer. wait out interacting with any dapps till things become clearer. cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@ledgerhq/…

Image
62
Reply
Read more about Balancer

Balancer V3 Launches Three-Token Stablecoin Pool on Monad

Balancer V3 Launches Three-Token Stablecoin Pool on Monad

Balancer V3 has deployed a three-token stablecoin pool on Monad, combining AUSD, USDC, and USDT0 in a single liquidity pool. **Key Features:** - First three-stablecoin pool enabled by Balancer V3 technology - Provides deep liquidity for AUSD stablecoin - Combines swap fees with lending yield for liquidity providers - Operates as both a stable and boosted pool The pool is now live and accessible at [balancer.fi](https://balancer.fi/pools/monad/v3/0x2daa146dfb7eaef0038f9f15b2ec1e4de003f72b). This deployment showcases V3's capability to handle multi-token stable pools, offering traders tighter spreads and liquidity providers additional yield opportunities beyond traditional two-token pairs.

Monad Enables Scalable Multi-Token Pools with Sub-Second Finality

**Monad's infrastructure breakthrough enables complex DeFi operations at scale.** The platform delivers: - **Sub-second finality** for near-instant transaction confirmation - **Parallel execution** allowing multiple operations simultaneously - **Cost-efficient multi-token pools** that remain practical at scale This technical foundation removes the latency and cost barriers that previously made complex pool operations inefficient on other chains. The infrastructure is purpose-built to support ambitious DeFi protocols requiring high throughput and low costs. Monad's approach addresses a core challenge in decentralized finance: maintaining performance as complexity increases.

Balancer V3 Deploys on Monad's High-Speed EVM Chain

Balancer V3 Deploys on Monad's High-Speed EVM Chain

Balancer is launching its V3 protocol on Monad, an EVM-compatible blockchain capable of processing 10,000 transactions per second with sub-second finality. **Key Details:** - Monad's infrastructure focuses on high-speed execution - Balancer V3 brings programmable liquidity infrastructure to the chain - The integration aims to match fast execution with efficient liquidity management The deployment represents a pairing of Monad's performance capabilities with Balancer's liquidity solutions. Users can follow [@Balancer](https://twitter.com/Balancer) for launch updates and partnership announcements.

Balancer V3 Launches on Monad to Solve High-Speed Liquidity Challenge

Balancer V3 is deploying on Monad, an EVM chain capable of 10,000 transactions per second with sub-second finality. **The Core Challenge:** - High throughput without adequate liquidity creates inefficiency - Fast execution is meaningless if liquidity pools cannot handle the trading volume - 10,000 TPS requires deep, capital-efficient liquidity infrastructure **The Solution:** Balancer's programmable liquidity aims to provide the capital efficiency needed to support Monad's high-speed execution environment, ensuring pools can absorb significant trading activity without breaking down.

Data from 961 Token Launches Reveals Critical LBP Configuration Mistakes

**Research Analysis Uncovers Launch Failure Patterns** Balancer and NEO Empresarial analyzed 961 Liquidity Bootstrapping Pools across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum (2021-2024) to identify which parameters actually matter. **Key Finding: Weight Slope is Critical** - Weight slope above **0.6 per hour** consistently predicts launch failures - Model identifies failing launches with 76% accuracy (0.76 AUC score) - Fast price drops overwhelm buyer demand regardless of project quality **Duration Sweet Spot: 48-72 Hours** - Pools under 24 hours: insufficient participation time (11.8% bot activity) - Pools over 72 hours: 60% more bot exploitation (16.8% bot activity) - Medium duration (24-72 hours): optimal at 10.4% bot activity **Surprising Non-Factors** - Starting weight ratios showed near-zero correlation with success - Swap fees (1-3%) had less than 5% variance in outcomes - These are preference parameters, not safety parameters **Bottom Line** Configuration won't make weak projects succeed, but poor configuration will sink strong ones. Teams can now test parameters using the [LBP Simulator](https://lbp.balancer.fi/lbp-simulator) before launch. Full methodology playbook releasing this week.

Exchanges