Gitcoin Retroactive Funding Experiment Results

Gitcoin has released an expanded version of its **d/acc Market Map**, a living document that maps technologies favoring defense over offense. The framework, based on Vitalik Buterin's concept of defensive acceleration, examines how systems can distribute rather than concentrate power. **Key developments:** - The map now covers the full defensive acceleration stack, extending beyond cryptocurrency - Focus on how funding mechanisms determine what gets defended - Document remains open for ongoing refinement and expansion The research explores how defensive acceleration exists in currently deployed systems, examining the relationship between funding structures and defensive capabilities. Read the full research: [Gitcoin d/acc Market Map](https://www.gitcoin.co/research/d-acc-market-map)

A pattern is emerging in the web3 ecosystem: **digital coordination tools are advancing faster than physical resilience infrastructure**. While numerous teams focus on digital coordination, fewer are building in critical areas like: - Biosecurity - Decentralized energy systems - Open source hardware These physical-layer technologies protect more than just information—they safeguard bodies and critical infrastructure. **The gap raises important questions**: Why does this disparity exist? What barriers prevent more teams from entering these spaces? The observation suggests that physical resilience infrastructure may need more attention and resources to catch up with digital coordination efforts.

**Funding mechanisms are emerging as a critical strategic component in the defensive acceleration (d/acc) technology stack.** The core insight: how capital is allocated directly determines which defensive technologies receive resources to develop and sustain operations. This creates a direct link between funding structures and what ultimately gets protected. **Key implications:** - Funding mechanisms aren't neutral—they actively shape the defensive technology landscape - Capital allocation acts as a filter determining which projects survive or fail - The "how" of funding is as important as the "what" being funded This perspective positions capital allocation not as a passive support function, but as an active strategic lever that communities can use to direct defensive technology development toward their priorities.

New coordination systems are emerging that enable communities to allocate resources without central control. These include: - **Quadratic funding** - Democratic resource allocation - **RetroPGF** - Retroactive public goods funding - **Streaming payments** - Continuous value distribution These mechanisms form what's being called the "institutional layer of d/acc" (defensive acceleration). They allow groups to make collective decisions and fund initiatives while maintaining decentralization. Recent workshops have explored how these systems can create resilient funding architectures that protect public goods research and regenerative projects from institutional failure.

**Core infrastructure focus**: Anti-collusion voting, privacy-preserving cryptography, and open source security form the essential defense layer for web3 systems. **Critical dependency**: These baseline protections prevent catastrophic failures across the entire stack. Without this foundation, higher-level applications and protocols cannot function securely. **Context matters**: Following major breaches like the theft of Social Security numbers, the emphasis on conflict-resistant systems has become urgent. The message is clear - survival-level defenses aren't optional extras but fundamental requirements for digital infrastructure.