DeAI Corner launches as a new segment highlighting builders in the decentralized AI space.
The inaugural episode features:
- Host @ghcryptoguy interviewing @vivian7days, CMO at @AskDollyToday
- Discussion on DeAI's impact on Dolly's platform
- Insights into why they chose 0G blockchain
- Vision for Web3 user experience improvements
This marks 0G's continued focus on DeAI development, following their recent Token2049 presentation where CEO @michaelh_0g outlined plans to make AI a public good through their tech stack.
How One AI Builder Slashed Costs by $82K Monthly Using Decentralized Infrastructure

**The Problem:** Most AI agent startups face brutal economics - a $29/month customer can cost $44 in inference alone, with compute eating 60-80% of operational expenses. **The Solution:** One builder cut costs by $82,000 monthly by switching to decentralized compute infrastructure, achieving 80-90% cost reduction compared to traditional cloud providers. **Key Insight:** For AI agent businesses in 2026, infrastructure choice directly impacts survival. The analysis covers: - Cost model breakdowns - Verification trade-offs (TEE vs ZKML) - Infrastructure prioritization strategies [Full analysis](http://0g.ai/blog/agentic-ai-market-infra-2026)
TEE vs ZKML: Two Ways to Verify AI Agent Trades
When an AI agent executes a $2M trade, verification becomes critical. Two production-ready solutions exist: **TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)** - Sub-second verification speed - Relies on hardware trust - Fast but hardware-dependent **ZKML (Zero-Knowledge Machine Learning)** - Cryptographic proof-based - No hardware requirements - Trustless but potentially slower Neither solution is perfect, but both are ready for production use. The choice depends on your specific requirements: speed and simplicity (TEE) versus trustlessness and flexibility (ZKML).
🏗️ AI Agent Infrastructure Guide: TEE vs ZKML Trade-offs
**Choosing the right infrastructure stack for AI agents in 2026 requires careful consideration of verification methods and cost models.** 0G Labs outlines key decision points for developers building AI agents: - **Verification approaches**: TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) vs ZKML (Zero-Knowledge Machine Learning) each offer different trade-offs in security and performance - **Cost considerations**: Infrastructure choices directly impact operational expenses - **Priority framework**: Understanding what to build first matters for successful deployment The guidance addresses a critical gap in the AI agent development space, where verification, developer frameworks, and real-world adoption remain key challenges for scaling beyond experimental use cases.
79% Deploy AI Agents, Only 23% Scale Successfully
**The AI Agent Scaling Crisis** A stark reality check for enterprise AI: while 79% of organizations have deployed AI agents, only 23% can scale them effectively. **The Core Problem** - AI technology itself works as intended - Infrastructure cannot support widespread deployment - Gap between adoption and scalability widens **What's Changed** This marks significant progress from 2024, when only 10% of organizations used AI agents. However, rapid adoption has exposed critical infrastructure limitations that prevent most enterprises from moving beyond pilot programs. **The Path Forward** Builders and enterprises need to address fundamental infrastructure bottlenecks before AI agents can deliver on their promise at scale. The technology readiness has outpaced the supporting systems required for production deployment.
0G and ARC Terminal Partner to Bridge Decentralized Compute with Onchain AI Interface

**0G** and **ARC Terminal** are collaborating to connect decentralized infrastructure with user-facing AI applications. - 0G provides the modular foundation for decentralized intelligence and compute - ARC Terminal creates the interface layer for human and AI agent interactions onchain - The partnership aims to bridge computational infrastructure with user intent This collaboration represents a practical step in making decentralized AI systems more accessible through improved interface design.